What Extent Do You Agree with This Statement?

As a leader of Russia, Stalin achieved come out of the closetstanding success between 19241939. To what extent do you agree with this statement? Explain your answer. I agree to the statement to a king-size extent. A leader is a several(prenominal) unrivaled who stands out different from other nondescript mountain with main ideal characteristics of having belligerence in address and action and tell apart for people and of being fitted to bonk with problems and find a solution to it.Stalin had ii of the qualities of being high-pressure in speech and action, and being able to present a solution in difficult situation, and his passion for his people was minimal. These traits of his as a leader influenced how he achieved successes, such as consolidating his rule everywhere Soviet married couple and achieving significant economic development, or resolvented in failure, such as huge valet de chambre damage involved, between 19241939. Stalin was politic each(prenominal )y an aggressive orator and a ruthless dictator.These characteristics of him enabled him to determine his position as the leader of Russia and give totalitarian rule over Russia. Stalin form a new constitution for the Soviet Union which seemed democratic outwardly further in event was his own backyard where everything was downstairs Stalins or the Central charge of the commie Partys rule. Furthermore, he embarked on a policy of purges in which many oppositions and rivals were executed unmercifully.Kamenev and Zinoviev were just hardly a(prenominal) of his potential rivals that were executed after a pretend show trial and some were even believed to be assassinated. Through all these ruthless measures taken with his aggressive personality, Stalin had achieved his last-ditch goal of steering he and his Communist Party to total control of Russia. Stalin too had a vision of his own and was able to produce solutions according to his vision in difficult situations and this helped him to achieve salient stinting development in short full stop of time.In 1931, Stalin prophesied correctly as it turned out that Russia had 10 years to modernise before it was attacked. Stalin wanted Soviet Union to be strong industrially as it would be more prep ard to turn down invasions and be more powerful than other westerly countries. Thus, Stalin announced collectivisation, where larger farm is form by gathering tiny farms in each village and more march on agricultural machineries were used, to create an efficient and modernized farming environment.In order to further forethought in progress in political economy by expanding industries and industrial production, Stalin excessively introduced a series of Five-Year Plans. It enabled rapid expansion of cloggy industries, such as coal, iron, steel and power, modernization of existing industries and formation of new industries with international experts employed. It also exercised tight control over labour force by place production targets for each itemory and acid punishments for pitiful absence and workmanship.Through Stalins economic policies, in long term, both impress and industrial production increased by manifold and almost full barter was achieved. Therefore, Stalins Stalin could prevent Russias scotch collapse economy and instead essential Russia as a country with one of the strongest economy. However, one characteristic Stalin wanted as a leader was love for his people which reflected negatively on his ruling of Russia. His peoples, especially the peasants, deaths were none of his concern and thus his puny care for his people led to poor quality of life for people.As a result of his economic plans, there was large inflow of people from the countryside and the towns and cities were unable to cope, resulting in kick downstairs out of slums and poor living and working(a) conditions. Production of consumer goods was also forgone to accommodate the engrossment on heavy indu stry. The forced and acidulated nature of his ruling and plans also incurred extremely high human cost. For example, due to resist against collectivisation, peasants burned their crops and killed their livestock.This resulted in widespread famine, especially in Ukraine where more than 7 gazillion died of starvation. Furthermore, to eliminate resistance, estimated 10 million Kulaks were executed. This shows how merciless Stalin was towards his people, particularly to those who oppose him. As such, Stalins uncompassionate feeling towards his people do him blind to all those human cost involved in his policies and caused much detest directed towards Stalin.To sum up, Stalin was in fact a large(p) leader who achieved great success between 19241939 with his strong visions, totalitarian rule and economic policies. However, there are other side of the coin where by his lack of love for his people caused great human cost. From here, one can interpret that though much developmental an d economical successes have been achieved through his totalitarian ruling and economic plans as evident from the fact that under Stalins rule, Russia became the second largest economically powerful country then.However, due to his lack of compassion and forced nature of the focus he carried out his plan, he achieved bitty on improvement of social conditions and his peoples quality of life and had failed to take on over the heart of his people. S work it is irrefutable that Stalin was one of the most memorable leaders, non only in Russia, but also in the world for his achievements mentioned above that lasted till the collapse of Soviet Union in 1991.